- From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:13:44 +0200
- To: tanguy lohéac <tanguy.loheac@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Cc: before & after WS <public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org>
Hi Tanguy, hi all. I think it's important always to use the last specification that is wide adopted. All browsers are XHTML 1.0 compliant. I think we could transimt a better and more efficacious message if we show as realize a good and accessible site with XHTML and CSS; the new WAI site is XHTML 1.0 Transitional. Regards ciao pasquale Il giorno 18/ott/05, alle ore 09:41, tanguy lohéac ha scritto: > Hi Pasquale and all, > To my mind it won't be meaningful to switch on another mark up > langugage for the good version. This would send a confusing message > toward the audience that it is necessaire to change the ml to make > an accessible version of the same page. > What's your opinion ? > Regards > Tanguy > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pasquale Popolizio" > <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com> > To: <shadi@w3.org> > Cc: "tanguy lohéac" <tanguy.loheac@snv.jussieu.fr>; "before & after > WS" <public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org> > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 6:17 PM > Subject: Re: first draft for good form page > > > >> Hi Shadi, >> I completely agree with you about divs; I only suggest to use >> XHTML 1.0 Transitional, like new WAI site. >> regards >> ciao >> pasquale >> >
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2005 08:14:03 UTC