Re: BAD TF: Resuming Work

Hi Shadi, hi all.

About questions:

>  - Does the design meet our requirements for being visually  
> attractive?

I think Klaus make a excellent work.
The few suggestions are, for home and form page:
- add a payoff at Header level, after Citylights logo, so is easier  
for the user to know what the site is about; in my draft of editorial  
plan I suggested a payoff like "Citylights, the city I wish".
- color some blocks of text in colors like blue and images captions  
like "Ut wisi enim" and "At vero as et" in "red".


> - Is it complex enough so that we can incorporate the features we  
> previously agreed on?

I check features at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/features for  
the home page
and I think we could add a list and a link text as "click here".
For the form page we could add a color coding for required input; but  
I think this can be made in the next steps.


>  - Are there going to be major problems making this design accessible?

I don't think there are major problems.


> Please send your comments and thoughts to the list! Additionally,  
> we should hold a meeting to check the status of progress next  
> Tuesday 11 October at 10am CET, please let me know your  
> availability for that time.


I'll try to connect and phone. Now I'm in bed with 38° ;-(
But I think that tomorrow I'll be better ;-)


Regards
ciao


pasquale







Il giorno 06/ott/05, alle ore 11:46, Shadi Abou-Zahra ha scritto:

> Dear Group,
>
> Apologies for not canceling today's meeting in time, I was held up  
> this morning and couldn't get into the office earlier.
>
> Anyway, Klaus has been very busy and developed a design for the  
> Demo pages. Klaus has only focused on the visual design so some of  
> the features other have developed may not be incorporated into the  
> new design yet. Here are the two sample pages for discussion:
>  Home Page: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/index.html>
>  Form Page: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/form.html>
>
> The next steps are that we discuss the design and finalize it soon.  
> Then we need to change the already developed pages according to the  
> new design. We should aim to get this done by next Wednesday 12  
> October, 2005 at the latest so that EOWG can discuss it on the call  
> of the following Friday.
>
> The questions for this design are:
>  - Does the design meet our requirements for being visually  
> attractive?
>  - Is it complex enough so that we can incorporate the features we  
> previously agreed on?
>  - Are there going to be major problems making this design accessible?
>
> Please send your comments and thoughts to the list! Additionally,  
> we should hold a meeting to check the status of progress next  
> Tuesday 11 October at 10am CET, please let me know your  
> availability for that time.
>
> Regards,
>   Shadi
>