- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:25:00 -0500
- To: public-wai-cc@w3.org
Looks good, but quick question ... Do you want suggestions here in the email thread? Elsewhere? In case here, I have two for now: 1. We need a mechanism whereby groups (I suppose including Task Forces, if not also Community Groups), can indicate a desire to track. Perhaps github labels, e.g. APA, AG, ARIA, RQTF, etc. 2. We need a mechanism whereby groups can indicate to be flagged at key milestone publication, or when a main publication is approaching. My thought is there may be some documents we might want to review when they're more mature, so how to indicate that? Possibly a pre-defined set of milestones all documents might traverse? A good one might be "CR expected in One Month." Else, this looks very useful! Thanks! Janina Michael Cooper writes: > I have expanded the draft proposal on cross-group review procedures in WAI, > for discussion Monday: > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/cc/wiki/Group_Coordination > > Michael -- Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa Linux Foundation Fellow https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
Received on Friday, 3 February 2023 20:25:12 UTC