Re: WAI-AGE task force agenda - 1-Oct-2008

Hello TF participants,

Some additional background and thoughts for this week's Teleconference:

Andrew Arch wrote:

> *AGENDA*:
> 
> 2. Requirements for revisions to the Business Case for Web Accessibility
>    <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-bcase-update.html>
>   * Is the purpose and objectives clear?
>   * Is the audience correct?
>   * Is the approach (not the detailed suggestions) appropriate?
>   * If you have additional initial update ideas, please send them to
> the mailing list.
> 

While it might be nice to revisit the Business Case entirely, the 
project does not allow for that at this stage. As per the draft 
Deliverables [1], the proposal is only to:
# Revise language throughout the suite to be more inclusive of the needs 
of older users; and
# add information regarding the demographics of older users to the 
section on social factors.
Thus, while I suggested we consider the audience and purpose this week, 
it was primarily to check that these was still ok.

Thus, what we really to think about is what are the most important 
things that we have found that should be brought into the business case 
to strengthen it, including highlighting the overlap between older users 
and people with disabilities.

The 'initial ideas' listed in the Requirements Document do not all have 
to be incorporated. I suggest the following:

*Overview*
- Examples - just 1 or 2 (older workers, and older citizens)
- mention the "UN Convention on People with Disabilities"

*Social Factors*
- add a reference in "Barriers to Web Use" to 
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-age-literature/#what to indicate the numbers of 
older users with disabilities
- consider changing "Access for Older Users" section to refer to the 
requirements of older users and link to 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/comparative.html for the detail. However, 
need to balance the need for WCAG 1.0 referencing still, vs future 
proofing for WCAG 2.0.
- stress the fact of older users often fall into the group "New and 
Infrequent Web Users"

*Technical Factors*
- essentially provide some linkages to WCAG 2.0

*Financial Factors*
- Within 'increased audience' add demographic changes and older users 
and link to the Lit Review appendix for Stats 
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-age-literature/#demog

*Legal and Policy Factors*
- consider adding in reference to older employees and 'age 
discrimination' legislation that exists in some jurisdictions
- under "Addressing Multiple Standards" stress the way WCAG 2.0 meets 
the requirements of older users

Throughout we need to balance the reference to the current WCAG 1.0 with 
the forthcoming WCAG 2.0.

Regards, Andrew
[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/deliverables.html#buscase

-- 
Andrew Arch
Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist
W3C/ERCIM, Sophia Antipolis, France
Ph +33 (0)4 92 38 79 46
www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 15:32:11 UTC