- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:42:32 -0400
- To: W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
- Cc: Advisory Board <ab@w3.org>
Dial-in: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/2ede49f6-0161-4f27-803e-08a5f66f2094/20250611T070000/ This meeting is at 7am Los Angeles / 1400 UTC, Wednesday 11 June 2025. Let's see if we can finalize P2025 for the AB. :) Note: We have a meeting scheduled for next week also! To handle any late-breaking feedback on P2025. === New Issues to Triage === Inconsistent terms for "Note" Issue: https://github.com/w3c/process/issues/1064 PR: https://github.com/w3c/process/pull/1067 Use "Staff Contact" instead of "Team Contact" Issue: https://github.com/w3c/process/issues/1066 Republishing a CR Snapshot for AC Review Issue: https://github.com/w3c/process/issues/1063 === Pull Requests to Review === Multi-point Multi-FO Councils Issue: https://github.com/w3c/process/issues/1041 PR: https://github.com/w3c/process/pull/1045 Clarify timing of Council being convened PR: https://github.com/w3c/process/pull/1046 Give the Chair suspension powers for emergencies PR: https://github.com/w3c/process/pull/1051 If we can tweak this until we're happy, we can send it back to the AB for review. If not, we'll keep working on it. :) === Any Remaining P2025 Business? === Assuming no further issues are raised before Monday the 16th, does the Process CG recommend that the AB officially initiate AC Review of the Process 2025 Draft? === Issues to Discuss === Parallelize Council work with dismissal Issue: https://github.com/w3c/process/issues/1039 This isn't about Process changes, but about interpreting the Process. Let's review the discussion and see if we have some advice. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2025 05:42:39 UTC