- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 15:08:11 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
- Cc: "'Gendler, Max'" <mgendler@newscorp.com>
Received on Sunday, 6 April 2025 13:09:47 UTC
On 1/13/25 18:06, fantasai wrote: > We've spoken several times about rechartering the Process CG as an IG as a way > to better formalize its role and its operations, so I took the time to write > up a first draft of what a Process IG charter might look like, attached. > > See https://github.com/w3c/process/issues/561 for discussion. Update attached, incorporating comments from plh wrt Scope section: https://github.com/w3c/process/issues/561#issuecomment-2590399146 ~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 6 April 2025 13:09:47 UTC