- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:18:21 -0400
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
Available at: https://www.w3.org/2022/06/08-w3process-minutes.html Text version: W3 Process CG 08 June 2022 [2]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/2022/06/08-w3process-irc Attendees Present fantasai, florian, jrosewell, plh, wseltzer Regrets Chris, Jeff Chair plh Scribe fantasai, wseltzer Contents 1. [3]Goals and timeline for upcoming Process: Work for the next 9 months. 2. [4]4 Pull requests: Let's approve pull requests within 2 weeks 3. [5]Director-Free Formal Objection handling: Status & next steps. 4. [6]Director-Free TAG appointment: Status & next steps. 5. [7]Director-Free Chartering and pre-AC review: Status & next steps. 6. [8]P2022 to close: restarting the closures. 7. [9]P2022 issues list. 8. [10]Next meeting: June 22. 9. [11]Summary of action items Meeting minutes Goals and timeline for upcoming Process: Work for the next 9 months. plh: Fantasai and I are your new chairs, welcome back … we have no fires … but we should set goals for the next 9mo … a few edits that have been approved and merged <plh> [12]Change log [12] https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/#changes-2021 plh: nothing that requires shipping a process update urgently … mainly continued prep for post-Director … Don't think we're on-track to ship a process in September … and as there are no significant substantive changes … We could get Dir-Free by Q1/Q2 2023 … need we ship a Process before then? I don't think so <wseltzer> +1 florian: agree … git would permit us to ship one while working on another in branch … but don't think it's worth the pause we've seen in the past fantasai: the pause was combo of explanation and exhaustion. don't think that's necessary here <fantasai> wseltzer: I think we should explicitly choose to wait until DF to update <plh> wseltzer: let's wait until we have Director-Free <florian> wfm plh: I think, unless someone comes with something critical, focus on Q1-Q2 Dir-Free release … by moving things one by one from Dir-Free branch to main 4 Pull requests: Let's approve pull requests within 2 weeks plh: PRs. Not looking for approval today, but heads-up that we'll ask for decision in 2 weeks … 2 PRs on the same issue … from wseltzer, florian florian: as mine preceded Wendy's, which has PSIG review … if people like Wendy's, take it fantasai: but Nigel pointed out problems ACTION: wseltzer to re-review 599 and Nigel's comments ACTION: everyone fix the process plh: if there are other things in 572, do a distinct PR … Wendy, tell us how to move forward <fantasai> florian: the additional changes in 572 are part of the same thing, just touching more of the surrounding text plh: 602 is simple clarification of how we announce charter extensions to AC florian: can we just approve this? … it's trivial wseltzer: +1 plh: let's merge 602 [13]https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/602/files [13] https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/602/files plh: 586 [14]https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/586 [14] https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/586 florian: this is one from Dir-Free … when a doc is making progress on rec track, there are things team should check … currently, it's marked the Director is supposed to do, but should be done by team … not decision responsibility but verification … it's starting from WG decision … and the possibility of AC review if something goes wrong … so it should be easy to replace Dir with Team plh: and a should became must plh: people SHOULD look at it … in 2 weeks, I'll ask if merge [15]https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/ 586#issuecomment-967144665 [15] https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/586#issuecomment-967144665 fantasai: I agree with changes. see Leonie's comment … that team should document exceptions … should address either in this PR or elsewhere florian: I'll add something plh: I'll want to make sure Ralph sees the update Director-Free Formal Objection handling: Status & next steps. plh: FOs florian: we have a description of Council in DF branch … not completely up-to-date with experimental process, esp wrt dismissal/recusal … we also need to review <plh> [16]W3M-AB Formal Objection Planning [16] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lB8Q_pvqxfN204FQHZ8D2HObxfo36qnguif9mGpEJTU/edit plh: I came up with this draft ^ … steps and who's responsible … check its alignment with DF florian: I expect most of that detail would go in to /Guide plh: agree. mostly check for consistency … and there's more work to be done around dismissal florian: not stable yet plh: I'll ask Ralph to join us next meeting, as he's been Council team contact florian: a nit, Member Submission appeal … we should fold into the same process once we have the Council, currently says for technical things go to TAG and for process things go to AB florian: and detail about what's public when … also group decision appeal. similar to FO, but not quite plh: timing … right now Dir can decide whether to address when objection is brought or at transition time … who addresses when to address? give Council the option? florian: timer starts when objection is filed. team has some time to review, ... plh: bad side effect … e.g. I have groups who have FO on record, who haven't sent transition request florian: start a new issue fantasai: people shouldn't be able to escalate to council at non-transition time unless at least formal decision to which they object, or long-standing (year-long) issue ignored … you shouldn't be able to go to council on e.g. an editor's choice that has not yet been escalated to the WG Director-Free TAG appointment: Status & next steps. florian: we had a complete proposal, we haven't touched it in a long time, probably need to simplify … how should we proceed? fantasai: think we should file an issue with AB … w high level overview plh: let's review proposal next time florian: I can proceed in parallel Director-Free Chartering and pre-AC review: Status & next steps. florian: DF branch just replaces Dir with Team … some people feel it's insufficient … and want more member role/transparency/mgt … should we do 2 steps or 1? plh: 2 steps. let's land what we have and then recognize we need to do better florian: I'm fine with it florian: but some people not here have indicated being uncomfortable with that plh: who will work on this, wendy? [discussion of florian making a PR of the minimal changes] P2022 to close: restarting the closures. plh: florian and david spent lots of time on issue triage … reminder, we'll do some issue closure <florian> [17]https://github.com/w3c/w3process/ issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22P2022+Proposed+to+clos e%22 [17] https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+label:"P2022+Proposed+to+close" plh: on upcoming calls P2022 issues list. plh: if you have issues that aren't on this list, please make sure you speak up … or if you believe issues should be dropped, florian: this isn't list of everything that must be fixed … it's a signal of things we'll probably try to solve plh: if you want issues to be on the list, chairs will be looking for volunteers. Next meeting: June 22. plh: btw, we should expect to share progress at TPAC [adjourned]
Received on Friday, 10 June 2022 15:18:19 UTC