W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > January 2021

Agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 6 Jan 7am PDT

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:07:41 -0800
Message-id: <30A1362B-0BAA-40CB-A315-B5FEBB17A3A6@apple.com>
To: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
Webex at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html>

IRC is #w3process

Log of prior meeting at <https://www.w3.org/2020/12/09-w3process-minutes.html>


Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM PACIFIC.

***This is off-cycle, as is the one on the 23rd Jan***


Overall purpose: welcome to 2021!




1) Assign scribe, etc.,

2) Agenda bash. I expect we need to bash a bit this time.


4) Issues and PRs tagged agenda+.  Yes/No, take discussion to Github, please.

4.1) Elevating a TAG document to W3C Approved Status  <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/461>

   we seem to have discussed it around but (modulo naming) we seem to be converging on the summary I just posted.

4.2) Streamlining the process document is a priority; where are we on that?

   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/356>

   (Note that making a separate Registry track goes in the opposite direction).

4.3) Enumerate the requirements for wide review

   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/130>

   Where are we?

4.4) all the rest of P2021 are Registries.

   Let’s discuss the survey. We haven’t had much feedback offline.

   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/466>


As time permits, 

5) Tooling? We ought to be able to make the ‘rules’ section, surely?

   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/435>
   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/436>




The usual closers:

6) Next meeting. 23 Jan

7) Any other business.



David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 6 January 2021 01:07:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 6 January 2021 01:07:56 UTC