- From: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <charles.nevile@consensys.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 01:10:12 +1100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
Not sure if I will make it. So... On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:53:35 +1100, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > 4.1) Discipline. I think we’re ready with simple text that address > > Consolidate discipline-related elements #418 > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/418> > Suspension / Removal for cause #312 > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/312> > > in > > Consolidate discipline-related text #432 > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/432> > > Are we ready to merge, close the issues? WfM > Do we have the D-F follow-on issue requested in 312? I raised #458 > 4.2) Close with no action? > > Maturity Level is a weird term #455 > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/455> +1 close > 4.3) Easy superseding > > Do we need a lighter-weight process for superseding when it's "obvious"? > #324 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/324> > > Proposed text in the last comment; good enough? I prefer not to add anything. I won't block consensus, but I will "cast a vote" against adding this. > 5.2) Voting process > > Clarify the voting process #60 > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/60> > > Chaals’ comment (last one) has 3 thumbs-up. Time to execute the proposal? I think so. (Better than the proposer, at any rate) > 5.3) The rest > > There are a number of thorny issues in there that are not converging and > yet are marked as a priority for this milestone. > > > The usual closers: > > 6) Next meeting. 28th Oct, I think. > > Can we meet the 7th Oct? Presumably you mean 28th. You are asking this on the 7 Oct (where I live) -- Charles "chaals" Nevile ConsenSys Lead Standards Architect
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2020 14:10:33 UTC