Re: Process CG Call for Consensus (CfC), responses needed

+1

P2020 has been stable at the Process CG level for some time.  It is time 
to get more eyes on the document which is exactly what will happen if we 
send it to the AB and then the AC.

Jeff

On 2/13/2020 4:26 PM, David Singer wrote:
> In the last call, those on the call had consensus that the document at <https://w3c.github.io/w3process/> is ready for the next steps and that the ProcessCG has taken it as far as it can.
>
> The next steps are
> * similar AB consensus at the upcoming AB face-to-face 25-27 feb
> * wider review by the AC in March
> * presentation to the AC at the upcoming Seoul meeting, discussion
> * adoption by the AC online (WBS)
>
> This is a formal Call for Consensus supporting the decision on the call: the Process CG sends it to the AB for the next steps.
>
> If you AGREE, please respond; expressions of support help us gauge the level of support.
>
> If you DISAGREE and believe that the ProcessCG is not done or the document should not advance as-is, you MUST respond to this email to have any impact (the default is to assume indifference or assent).
>
> The response MUST indicate +1/-1, or support/oppose the CfC, to be used.
>
> The deadline to respond is one week, end of business Friday the 21st Feb. (Before the AB meeting).
>
> Thank you.
>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>

Received on Friday, 14 February 2020 14:38:18 UTC