W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > May 2019

Re: Increasing the number of TAG

From: Naomi Yoshizawa <naomi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 17:41:51 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHom5vd9WKKtpFpQhiq-6-HjST5Y4w-PGKyeOQPRuQURq4s+Fg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>
Cc: "lw@tetralogical.com" <lw@tetralogical.com>, Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, David Singer <singer@mac.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Hello Dan,

Thanks so much for taking it as homework at TAG. Yes, TAG knows the best.
I'd appreciate being shared with any proposals.

On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 2:03 AM Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>

> Hi - happy to provide some more detail. It is true that we are currently
> not moving quickly enough and therefore we are falling behind in meeting
> the needs of our stakeholders.  I might support adding an additional member
> to the TAG but I wouldn't go beyond that. I also think it's a fallacy to
> think that adding another person necessarily makes the TAG operate faster.

That happens everywhere, not only at the TAG.

Thanks to David, Michael and Leonie for caring on this as well.


> I think there was a book written about this? We are about to have our f2f
> in a week's time and we are going to dedicate some time there to having a
> retrospective of how the TAG currently works and how we can operate faster
> and more efficiently. Can we take it as homework to come back to you with
> any proposals about the makeup of the TAG that might come out of this
> session?
> Dan
> On Saturday, May 11, 2019, Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com> wrote:
>> On 10/05/2019 19:35, Michael Champion wrote:
>>> I'd be happy to raise the issue in GitHub, but I'd be interested in
>>> learning more from Naomi about the information she has that the TAG is
>>> overloaded and whether the TAG members / chairs support the idea of getting
>>> more people to help.  We did increase the size of the TAG by one person
>>> recently, and it would be good to know if that helped somewhat, and how
>>> many more people it would take to really handle the workload.
>> It would also help to understand more about what the workload is.
>> Léonie.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
>>> Date: Friday, May 10, 2019 at 8:52 AM
>>> To: Naomi Yoshizawa <naomi@w3.org>
>>> Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Increasing the number of TAG
>>> Resent-From: <public-w3process@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date: Friday, May 10, 2019 at 8:52 AM
>>>      Sure
>>>           can you raise an issue in the Process CG repo, and probably
>>> then one of us should alert the AB?
>>>           > On May 10, 2019, at 6:47 , Naomi Yoshizawa <naomi@w3.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>      >
>>>      > Hello David and Revising W3C Process Community Group,
>>>      >
>>>      > Could the group discuss to boost the number of TAG, please? There
>>> is a voice to increase the headcount of TAG since every TAG member barely
>>> has enough time to review everything that comes in.
>>>      >
>>>      > Thanks,
>>>      > Naomi
>>>           David Singer
>>>           singer@mac.com
>> --
>> @TetraLogical TetraLogical.com
Received on Monday, 13 May 2019 08:42:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:51 UTC