W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > March 2019

Re: Evergreen Formal Objection handling (ESFO)

From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:42:56 -0400
To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Siegman, Tzviya" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2e2f1b7d-4a38-88c7-d83f-8ae7ec4ca4de@w3.org>

On 3/14/2019 4:12 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> I'd like to propose text that says something like
>
>     Similar to in the REC track, the Chair has a responsibility to
>     ensure the Group operates under consensus.  In the ES track, it
>     will likely be less likely to issue calls for consensus or assess
>     consensus as a result of a poll of participants; however, theChair
>     has an important oversight role to ensure that the group's
>     discussions proceed according to the procedural approach chartered
>     for the group, are in accordance with CEPC, and has the
>     responsibility to be an impartial facilitator to decision-making
>     when necessary.  Finally, of course, the Chair is the arbiter to
>     whom participants appeal when they disagree with the way that the
>     editors are documenting the evolving consensus of the group. The
>     chair can facilitate discussion between the participant and
>     editor, issue informative calls for consensus, or engage in other
>     discussions to see whether consensus can be reached or whether the
>     editor can adjust their position.  Ultimately, the Chair has the
>     authority to overrule the Editor and remove them if necessary.
>
This all sounds good to me.  And this sounds like the normal, 99%+ way 
of operating.

I also think we need a FO process.  There are times that the editor, WG 
participants, and chair all have similar perspectives. In the 
multistakeholder web there needs to be the possibility for appeal beyond 
the groupthink.
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:42:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:50 UTC