Re: Evergreen Formal Objection handling (ESFO)

On 3/14/2019 11:33 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
> 
> On 3/14/2019 11:05 AM, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote:
>> Here is my iteration on this, attempting to simplify David's proposal:
>> [[
>> * must document unresolved formal objections in the document header 
>> and relevant parts of the spec.
>> * must ensure Director review of all pending formal objections before 
>> 24 months have elapsed.
>> * must reflect resolved formal objections in the spec, in particular 
>> adjusting the document if the objection was subtained.
> 
> s/subtained/sustained/

fixed.

> You left out the situation (presumably as a simplification) that the WG 
> does not want to adjust the document.  Are we saying that the WG does 
> not have the choice to continue to disagree and reduce their status to a 
> PD or Note?

Simplification but I only had the case for Note covered through the 
possible Next Steps, but I didn't have the preliminary draft in there. 
Added. Thanks for catching it.

Philippe

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2019 15:50:08 UTC