- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:50:03 -0400
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Cc: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 3/14/2019 11:33 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > > On 3/14/2019 11:05 AM, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote: >> Here is my iteration on this, attempting to simplify David's proposal: >> [[ >> * must document unresolved formal objections in the document header >> and relevant parts of the spec. >> * must ensure Director review of all pending formal objections before >> 24 months have elapsed. >> * must reflect resolved formal objections in the spec, in particular >> adjusting the document if the objection was subtained. > > s/subtained/sustained/ fixed. > You left out the situation (presumably as a simplification) that the WG > does not want to adjust the document. Are we saying that the WG does > not have the choice to continue to disagree and reduce their status to a > PD or Note? Simplification but I only had the case for Note covered through the possible Next Steps, but I didn't have the preliminary draft in there. Added. Thanks for catching it. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2019 15:50:08 UTC