Re: Increasing the number of TAG

Hello Dan,

Could you share conversation on this at the last TAG f2f, please?

Thanks,
Naomi

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:25 AM Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:

> Incidentally, when we increased the membership of the AB last year (
> https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/190), we discussed increasing the
> TAG as well.  I followed up with several TAG members and got the same
> response - they were not convinced that the TAG would be able to increase
> its workload by adding members, and it would complexify logistics.  I will
> continue to support their take on that, whatever it is.  :)
>
> *From: *Naomi Yoshizawa <naomi@w3.org>
> *Date: *Mon, May 13, 2019 at 1:42 AM
> *To: *Daniel Appelquist
> *Cc: *lw@tetralogical.com, Michael Champion, David Singer,
> public-w3process@w3.org
>
> Hello Dan,
>>
>> Thanks so much for taking it as homework at TAG. Yes, TAG knows the best.
>> I'd appreciate being shared with any proposals.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 2:03 AM Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi - happy to provide some more detail. It is true that we are currently
>>> not moving quickly enough and therefore we are falling behind in meeting
>>> the needs of our stakeholders.  I might support adding an additional member
>>> to the TAG but I wouldn't go beyond that. I also think it's a fallacy to
>>> think that adding another person necessarily makes the TAG operate faster.
>>
>>
>> +1
>> That happens everywhere, not only at the TAG.
>>
>> Thanks to David, Michael and Leonie for caring on this as well.
>>
>> Best,
>> Naomi
>>
>>
>>> I think there was a book written about this? We are about to have our
>>> f2f in a week's time and we are going to dedicate some time there to having
>>> a retrospective of how the TAG currently works and how we can operate
>>> faster and more efficiently. Can we take it as homework to come back to you
>>> with any proposals about the makeup of the TAG that might come out of this
>>> session?
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> On Saturday, May 11, 2019, Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/05/2019 19:35, Michael Champion wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd be happy to raise the issue in GitHub, but I'd be interested in
>>>>> learning more from Naomi about the information she has that the TAG is
>>>>> overloaded and whether the TAG members / chairs support the idea of getting
>>>>> more people to help.  We did increase the size of the TAG by one person
>>>>> recently, and it would be good to know if that helped somewhat, and how
>>>>> many more people it would take to really handle the workload.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It would also help to understand more about what the workload is.
>>>>
>>>> Léonie.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
>>>>> Date: Friday, May 10, 2019 at 8:52 AM
>>>>> To: Naomi Yoshizawa <naomi@w3.org>
>>>>> Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Increasing the number of TAG
>>>>> Resent-From: <public-w3process@w3.org>
>>>>> Resent-Date: Friday, May 10, 2019 at 8:52 AM
>>>>>
>>>>>      Sure
>>>>>           can you raise an issue in the Process CG repo, and probably
>>>>> then one of us should alert the AB?
>>>>>           > On May 10, 2019, at 6:47 , Naomi Yoshizawa <naomi@w3.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>      >
>>>>>      > Hello David and Revising W3C Process Community Group,
>>>>>      >
>>>>>      > Could the group discuss to boost the number of TAG, please?
>>>>> There is a voice to increase the headcount of TAG since every TAG member
>>>>> barely has enough time to review everything that comes in.
>>>>>      >
>>>>>      > Thanks,
>>>>>      > Naomi
>>>>>           David Singer
>>>>>           singer@mac.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> @TetraLogical TetraLogical.com
>>>>
>>>>