- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:14:36 +0900
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Le 14 févr. 2019 à 01:28, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> a écrit : > Does anyone want to defend the use of Labels for this kind of triaging? My two cents on using milestones and labels. On the webcompat.com project [1], we are using GitHub as a backend [2] and indeed labels and milestones for categorising. Here a way to think about it: * labels == class values in HTML You can assign multiple labels to an issue. * milestone == id value in HTML. You can assign only ONE milestone to an issue. An issue can only be in one milestone at a time. On webcompat.com, we assign a milestone for the phase the issue is in, it moves from 1. needstriage 2. needsdiagnosis 3. needscontact 4. contactready 5. sitewait then a list of "closed" status milestones like duplicate, fixed, etc. The issue can only be in one stage at a time. The labels on the other hand are things like browser-* type-* etc. Hope it helps. [1]: https://webcompat.com/ [2]: https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues -- Karl Dubost 🐄 http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Friday, 15 February 2019 00:15:06 UTC