W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2018

RE: DRAFT-R1 agenda for the next Process Call, Oct 3rd (note odd week) 7am PDT

From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:05:56 +0000
To: "singer@apple.com" <singer@apple.com>, W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SN6PR02MB4831212083F69D50B2A68E7FD5E90@SN6PR02MB4831.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Regrets, I have a conflicting meeting.

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: singer@apple.com [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 1:10 PM
To: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
Subject: DRAFT-R1 agenda for the next Process Call, Oct 3rd (note odd week) 7am PDT

Rev.1 adds an explicit agenda item for Issues tagged agenda+.  Doh

Webex at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2018Oct/0000.html>



IRC is #w3process

Log of prior meeting at <https://www.w3.org/2018/09/12-w3process-minutes.html>


Usual meeting time: SECOND WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM Yes, this is one week early.


1) Assign scribe, etc.,

2) Review of Pull Requests that are pending, concentrating on those that address Process2019Candidate issues. ****We would like this to be the meat of the call.****

   (Note, as of time of writing, there are only two, neither agreed).

   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls>

3) Issues tagged Agenda+ and open

   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/Agenda%2B>

4) Review remaining Process2019 Priorities, focusing on those that don’t have associated pull requests, but do have assignees (and asking why not):

   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+label%3AProcess2019Candidate+-no%3Aassignee>

     Special focus on issues that HAVE a tentative conclusion in the discussion, converting that into an agreement for the editor to Pull Request.

   No unassigned Process2019Candidate issues.

(There are no Assigned issues that are not also Process2019Candidate issues:
<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+-label%3AProcess2019Candidate+assignee%3A*>)

5) Decide on how/when to progress this to AC ballot and possible adoption.

Diff from current process: <https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2FProcess-20180201%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fw3process%2F>

* 2.3.1 increase in AB size
* 2.5.0, 2.5.1 clarifications on AB/TAG participation
* 2.5.2 define ‘affiliation’ for the purposes of avoiding dual representation
* 3.6 ‘written’ notification means recorded
* 6.1.2 cleanup and re-ordering for clarity (I think) of advancement process
* 6.2.6 (new) requirements of license grants from non-WG members
* 6.9 editorial (I think) cleanup to rescinding/obsoleting
* whatever we did in the call


6) If we have time, new issues and updates.

6.1) new since prior call: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2018-09-12+>

6.2) updated but not Process2019Candidate <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2018-09-12+-label%3AProcess2019Candidate+>

7) Next meeting. Wed November 14th. Post-TPAC considerations.

8) Any other business.


Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2018 13:06:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:48 UTC