Re: Revising 7.2 Appeal by Advisory Committee Representatives (was Re; Agenda Process Document ...) from Daniel Glazman on 2016-06-20 (public-w3process@w3.org from June 2016)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:13:32 +0200
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <7a3dc913-b0a6-c794-fca4-a8f0aced8ab2@disruptive-innovations.com>

On 20/06/2016 17:35, David Singer wrote:

> 3) As Daniel says, the emails to the AC are going to have to say clearly
> “I support this appeal.”  We need the text to say that 5% of the AC
> clearly indicate their formal support for the appeal, in their email to
> the AC.

I think this is more error-prone and considerably more painful to
monitor than a WBS form. I would support a switch to a form.

</Daniel>

Received on Monday, 20 June 2016 19:13:59 UTC