Re: Updated Editor's draft

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 1:20 , Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 08:45:38PM +0200, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote:
>> 
>>> not just supergroups (btw, can we stop calling that supergroup? a
>>> supergroup is currently a group with taskforces, even if that name does
>>> not appear in the Process)
>> 
>> the name 'supergroup' doesn't, and I hope won't, appear in the
>> process, precisely because it means different things to different
>> people.
> 
> OK, but I had the feeling that it was not intended to be applied to all
> group recharterings.

any time spec development spans more than one charter period.

from a formal point of view, whether the name happens to match doesn’t seem very relevant

Dave Singer

singer@mac.com

Received on Monday, 18 July 2016 23:15:47 UTC