- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:16:30 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:10:55 +0200, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 7/10/2016 8:40 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've pushed a new Editor's draft of the Process, incorporating all the >> things I found as agreed. >> >> Roughly: >> >> Voting. >> I started at the start of the section that voting would be by STV. This >> also implies ranking - but there can still be ties. That simplified some >> of the changes. > > Is this the same as the previously agreed to text? > > https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/wiki/Voting2016 Not exactly. It is the editor's first attempt at incorporating the text into the document, which means there are some changes. I have tried very hard not to introduce any substantive change in meaning. Of course, the group is welcome to direct the editor word for word, but my general approach is to take what is written and edit it into the document as it apparently makes sense - i.e. to me. cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 08:17:02 UTC