- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:57:31 +0100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 22/12/2016 14:14, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > I don't think it is academic at all. As I mentioned elsewhere in the > thread, I would be quite interested if there is a consensus of the CSSWG > that the reference to WICG be dropped from the Charter. Short answer, we don't "have any authority to (answer) in the name of the CSS WG". Why didn't you ask that question BEFORE inserting that incubation change into the Charter totally baffles me. At this point, I'd like to establish a comparison with another recently approved [1] Charter, the Audio Working Group's Charter: 1. The review started on the 3rd of october 2. During the review a comment was considered as introducing a change requiring notification to ACs 3. The Charter was updated *AND* a notification of change was sent to all ACs on the 22nd of november so ACs could approve or not the change or even revise their votes 4. The Charter was approved earlier today, so one month later, leaving largely enough time to ACs to deal with that change The way the substantive change to the Audio WG Charter was handled is precisely what we expected from W3M for the CSS WG, precisely what should always happen. Section 2.2 of the Process makes "assessment of consensus" a "key responsibility" for the Director (and his delegates) in the Chartering process, and it was clearly not respected with the CSS WG Charter. I understand W3M still does not see why the change to the CSS WG Charter was substantive; you have here at least 3 members of the CSS WG in major disagreement with your point of view. Incubation was limited to CSS WG and joint efforts with other WGs. You changed that, and it is clearly substantive, at least to me. We're not discussing what the CSS WG thinks now of incubation in WICG, Jeff (and it's out of scope here), you have all the powers to prompt your Staff Contacts about that. We're discussing the way you made the change. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2016OctDec/0069.html </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2016 16:57:58 UTC