- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:09:31 +0900
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 17:20, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > On 19/12/2016 09:03, Daniel Glazman wrote: > >> Given your reaction, given how "voluntary" this change is quoted, I am >> requesting officially, as a Member, immediate disclosure of the full >> and detailed rationale why it was urgently needed to so drastically >> modify the Process of "one of the most successful WG of the W3C" >> without the Membership in the loop and without respecting entirely >> the Process, in conformance with Process Section 7.1.2 item 2. > > I see that my phrasing above can be confusing, let me clarify: 7.1.2 > item 2 makes it mandatory to release the rationale behind a substantive > charter change. I already explained why the charter announcement > countains a report about the change but no rationale. I want the full > rationale disclosed, with answers to my questions. Thanks, and sorry > for the confusing phrasing again. Having heard various participants in the CSSWG being baffled, and being confused myself at how this came to be, I would appreciate some transparency as well. -Florian Rivoal Vivliostyle AC Rep
Received on Monday, 19 December 2016 09:10:02 UTC