- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:01:28 -0400
- To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
- Cc: ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:01:32 UTC
fyi -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Process2016 draft Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:07:59 +0000 Resent-From: w3t@w3.org Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:07:48 +0200 From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> To: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org> CC: W3C Team <w3t@w3.org>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> I spotted a, I believe, spelling mistake in the new draft; I am not sure who has the right to change it, so I simply send it to the team... - In section 5.2.6, paragraph after the second bullet list, it says "and is the draft against which exclusions are be made,". I presume this should be "and is the draft against which exclusions are made," - In the paragraph right after it: "Recommendation is deemd" -> "Recommendation is deemed" - Section 6.9, third paragraph "rescnds or obsoletes" -> "rescinds or obsoletes" - Section 13, acknowledgement, says "Delfí Ramírez, Florian Rivoal, Wendy Seltzer (W3C),". This looks as if Delfí and Florian were at W3C. I suppose, a few lines later, that Ben Wilson is indeed at Google, but that assumption may actually be wrong. I think it is cleaner if all persons have their affiliation clearly listed (unless explicitly asked; is this the case?) Ivan
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:01:32 UTC