RE: Updated proposal: Adopting STV for TAG/AB elections

Works for me

Steve Z

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 1:23 PM
To: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
Subject: Re: Updated proposal: Adopting STV for TAG/AB elections


> On Apr 25, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Ian,
> I believe that you have correctly implemented the results of this morning's discussion.
> 
> I would, however, suggest one change:
> 
> OLD: When there is a vote, each Member (or group of related Members) is invited to rank candidates in order of preference.
> 
> NEW: When there is a vote, each Member (or group of related Members) is invited to submit one ballot that ranks the candidates the Member finds acceptable  in preference order.
> 
> My goal here is to identify the "ballot" is specifying the ranking order and to get David Singers "you find acceptable" into the statement. The last bit is just English preference and not so important that you really need to make a change. I could also live with "a ballot" instead of "one ballot”.

I propose a friendly editorial amendment:

 "When there is a vote, each Member (or group of related Members) is invited to submit one ballot that ranks candidates in the Member's preferred order.”

Ian
--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs

Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447

Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 00:31:34 UTC