W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Charter / Process failure - Was: Re: FPWD: Discovery & Registration of Multimodal Modality Components: State Handling

From: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 01:35:41 +0200
To: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.x402hrclsvvqwp@gillie.local>
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:06:17 +0200, timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a few asks:
> 1. Can we ask that Charters include a `Start Date` along with an `End  
> Date`?
> 2. Can the Start/End Date section also include a `Previous Charter`
> link? -- currently it's buried in Charter Prose.

Hi timeless,

Further to your feedback (thank you!), as well as feedback from others via  
different lists, and in the wake of the adoption of Process 2015, I am  
pleased to report that our charter template has been updated.

Changes include:
* adding to top table:
       - Start date (date of the call for participation)
       - Charter extension that points to the "About"
* adding to the "About" a charter extension history section

Those changes will be reflected in charters of groups that the Director  
approves after Process 2015 became operational.

> 3. Can the notifier/team somewhat actively police WGs trying to
> publish their first FPWD of their current charter after the new
> Process has been established? (Especially for groups [like MMI] that
> don't explicitly say they plan to operate under the old charter).
> 4. Can we ask that Charters be Public? (And if there are any other non
> Public charters, can they please be fixed...)

(This question is for Philippe)


Best regards,

Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Marketing & Communications -  http://www.w3.org
mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 23:35:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:31 UTC