Re: [Issue-164][Issue-165][Issue-167] Resending: Suggested Changes to clarify Appeals in the W3C Process Document from timeless on 2015-09-11 (public-w3process@w3.org from September 2015)

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:40:51 -0400
To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACsW8eGUEFEfUuW4Msy1JB_E3R32dFL-+7-5sHOqibsdb33Kag@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
> REPLACEMENT: "If there was any dissent<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#def-Dissent>
> to the Working Group decision to request advancement,
> Advisory Committee representatives MAY initiate an Advisory Committee appeal<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#ACAppeal>
> to the W3C Decision to advance the technical report."

I'd suggest "of the W3C" instead of "to the W3C"

> Advisory Committee representatives may initiate an Advisory Committee Appeal<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#ACAppeal> to the W3C Decision."

here you've capitalized "Appeal". I don't currently have an opinion
about case, but I'd probably favor consistency :).

Received on Friday, 11 September 2015 19:41:19 UTC