Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force on Webex Monday, 12 October 2015

Steve,

agenda+ how to make this task force more successful.

It was asserted in an AB call earlier this week that there is no 
continuity in the current task force and it looks undirected.

I didn't say those things, but I can't say I disagree.

In my opinion, the weekly calls we previously had - while also lacking 
in participation - at least gave continuity and direction to the work.  
And when people really cared about something they could jump in.  I fear 
we have taken a step backwards.

My agenda+ is not to propose a solution, just to get the issue on the 
agenda.

Jeff

On 10/5/2015 11:25 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>
> The call is on Monday, 12 October, 2015 at 15:00-16:00 UTC 
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=26&year=2014&hour=14&min=00&sec=0&p1=0>
> (Note this is Columbus Day in the United States)
> *Webex Information (Note change of Telcon site)*
>
> Dial-in: +1-617-324-0000
>
> Access code: 641 501 274
>
> Meeting number: 641 501 274
>
> Meeting password: process
>
> URL to join meeting: 
> https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mbea8090287ebcf2d2cbf4b3a2b15dda9
>
> Host key: 628756
>
> This meeting is now monthly, has moved to Monday and is held one hour 
> later than before
>
> For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times were:
>
> Pacific:  8:00
>
> Eastern US: 11:00
>
> Central Europe: 17:00
>
> Japan: 24:00
>
> The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of 
> open issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move 
> toward closure.
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1.Review Open Action Items
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/open
>
> 2.Discuss Issues and Proposals for “Appeals” Issues
> Toward the end of the process of creating Process 2015, a number of 
> issues related to "appeals" in the W3C process surfaced. At that time, 
> there seemed to be too little time to appropriately address the issues 
> with the care the seem to be needed. Now that Process 2015 is in 
> Review, it is time to start on revisions for Process 2016 and the 
> "appeals" issues seem like a good place to start. The issues:
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/164
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/165
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/166
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/167
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/7
>
> and the proposal:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Jul/0030.html
>
> Note: there have been zero comments on the text of the proposal. Does 
> this mean it is OK as is?
>
> 3.Issue-163 Update of Members that are Consortia themselves
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Sep/0008.html
>
> 4.Replacement figures for sections 6.1.1 and 6.7
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Oct/0000.html
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Oct/0001.html
>
> 5.Possible Issues related to Chartering Working Groups
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Sep/0013.html
>
> 6.Choose next set of topics to pursue
>
> 7.Review other Open and Raised Issues
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/
>
> 8.Any Other Business
>
> Steve Zilles
>
> Chair, Process Document Task Force
>