RE: ISSUE-100

Chaals,

I am fine with your diagram and have no comment on the accessibility of it. However, the request of Issue 101 (sic) was to list the key entry criteria for each state transition rather than have (vague) text. You have dropped most of the criteria listed in the diagram previously under discussion. I have attached an updated version of that diagram with the last agreed upon labels. This diagram also splits out the cases for Edited Recommendations, something that would only be needed in the section on Editing recommendations much as the Notes section is only needed under Notes.



Steve Z

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Chaals McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru]

> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:51 AM

> To: public-w3process@w3.org

> Subject: ISSUE-100

>

> Hi,

>

> I have tried to modify the graphics - and at the same time improve their

> accessibility. Sadly the latter job is hard - weak aria implementation means

> screen-reader accessibility is limited, and even weaker general SVG

> implementation means that for the most part screen readers are getting the

> best deal going - which is still rotten.

>

> Anyway, here is a diagram that includes the ability to publish as notes.

>

> I would anticipate having a stripped-down version of this for the start of

> chapter 7, as the "standard" path, introduce this version where we talk about

> notes and the fact that a WD might end up as a note instead of moving along

> the hoped-for path, and then add underneath a similarly better-annotated

> and more accessible version of what is already in there that covers the process

> of revising a Rec.

>

> --

> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex

>   chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru> - - - Find more at http://yandex.com