W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Process CG process question - was RE: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 2 June 2015

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:45:36 -0700
Cc: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <60C8484A-2E11-4B46-B83E-8556B4565874@apple.com>
To: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>

> On Jun 1, 2015, at 14:01 , Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> I am surprised that a change that got 4 FOs did not get a reasonable number of other votes.
> Did you mean "comments" rather than "votes"?  The preponderance of opinion inside my organization is that the proposed TAG change is a good one, but I didn't see the need to call that out in a comment. If that were a separate ballot question I would have voted for the TAG change.

No, I meant votes.  “Oh finally this problem gets ameliorated, I should vote yes” or “this change gives me concern, I should indicate a preference not to do it”.  Only 23 AC reps voted at all…

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:46:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:29 UTC