W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force on Webex Monday, 10 August 2015

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:47:38 -0700
Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <C9DF86E8-93FD-4AA9-86F3-1CC152B2A7B3@apple.com>
To: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
regrets, sorry, I didn’t check email yesterday evening

> On Aug 9, 2015, at 7:43 , Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> The call is on Monday, 13 July, 2015 at  15:00-16:00 UTC 
> Webex Information (Note change of Telcon site)
> Dial-in: +1-617-324-0000
> Access code: 641 501 274
>  
> Meeting number: 641 501 274
> Meeting password: process
> URL to join meeting: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mbea8090287ebcf2d2cbf4b3a2b15dda9
> Host key: 628756
>  
> This meeting is now monthly, has moved to Monday and is held one hour later than before
>  
> For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times were:
> Pacific:  8:00
> Eastern US: 11:00
> Central Europe: 17:00
> Japan: 24:00 
>  
> The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of open issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move toward closure.
>  
> Agenda:
> 1.      Review Open Action Items
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/open
> 2.      Discuss Issues and Proposals for “Appeals” Issues
> Toward the end of the process of creating Process 2015, a number of issues related to "appeals" in the W3C process surfaced. At that time, there seemed to be too little time to appropriately address the issues with the care the seem to be needed. Now that Process 2015 is in Review, it is time to start on revisions for Process 2016 and the "appeals" issues seem like a good place to start. The issues:
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/164
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/165
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/166
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/167
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/7
> and the proposal:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Jul/0030.html
> Note: there have been zero comments on the text of the proposal. Does this mean it is OK as is?
> 3.      Choose next set of topics to pursue
> 4.      Review other Open and Raised Issues
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/
> 5.      Any Other Business
>  
> Steve Zilles
> Chair, Process Document Task Force

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 10 August 2015 17:48:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:31 UTC