- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:34:04 -0400
- To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 10/14/14 6:44 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > > 14.10.2014, 01:53, "Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>: > >> The discussion of the topic has raised a number of issues, such as what is the best way to do notifications (push, pull, both, calendars, ...). > I believe the intention in proposing a mailing list is to clarify that at least that mechanism is one that should be used, without prejudice beyond the resource cost to additional possible mechanisms. Right (seems silly to not start simple, especially since we already have at least one WG that asked for some guidance). > >> The CSS WG, for example, often requests (on www-style) reviews of major changes of a single feature. Would this list be appropriate for such announcements? It seems like a little common sense here would indicate that yes, if a group wants more review than their `normal` list, they could send a RfC to all relevant groups (f.ex. the horizontal review groups) and could also Cc public-review-announce. >> Finally, this discussion has taken place on public-w3process, but the most people most affected by this proposal are on the Chairs mailing list. Would not that list be a more appropriate place to do a CfC? This was already done when the CfC was started <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2014OctDec/0040.html>. -AB
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:34:36 UTC