- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:24:36 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On 07/10/2014 07:45, Ian Hickson wrote: > No spec says exactly what is implemented. > > There are no browsers that implement HTML4 as written. > > There are no browsers that implement _any_ standard exactly as written. 1. the spec does not have to say what is implemented and how, the browser vendor has to. See Domenic's response to my message. 2. I never said MUAs implement exactly what's in the spec, that's out of scope, you read my words too fast. I said companies need to know what is the stable spec basis for implementation in the browser they're testing. This is different. > Having a snapshot specification does not serve the purpose that you > describe as needed in this argument. And how do you know? Your large experience of 100,000+ employees' utilities or brick-and-mortar companies? AFAICT, you have never worked for such a company, right? I was the one who wrote the Web tech directives for a brick-and-mortar distributed 140,000 employees company, and I worked seven years on a daily basis with their browser evaluation team. I think I am a bit more qualified than you on this topic... You can say that you disagree, that is fine; but your firm response « no, that does not do the job » is absolutely not authoritative. > It's a snapshot with legal rammifications; multinationals have made > specific legal commitments to the text of that document. Changing it in > any way is simply not on the table. This would be hilarious if it was not so tragic. >> It is just insulting hundreds of thousands of people. > > It is insulting nobody. Oh trust me, it is. That's fine if you don't want to see it, but your perception of facts will not alter others' perception of facts. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 06:24:59 UTC