Re: w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end ? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

+1 for 10 days. I could also go with 14 (two weeks).

Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on AT&T


-----Original message-----
From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Sent: Fri, Feb 14, 2014 20:13:43 GMT+00:00
Subject: w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/86


Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)

In the thread from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Feb/0015.html Ian, Wayne and I discussed the expression of, and the actual timing of the end of PR with relation to exclusion periods. For ages the new draft has said review should end at least 3 days after CR (used to imply the beginning of the exclusion period), but by beginning the 28 days at least 35 days after the publication.

I propose to say it "should end at least 10 days after the last exclusion period". I think this is clearer, and 10 days is better than 3 (we'll see if the AC is OK with that much time - I don't really care how long they want to wait so I don't think it is a big deal to change it)