- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:40:03 +0100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 22/12/14 14:55, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > It is interesting. Your response is on a thread which started with > "Limiting Charter extensions". Yes. Because the CSS WG had to use several times such extensions... The time needed to prepare a new charter took us beyond limits. In fact, I think that the two or three last times we rechartered, the CSS WG was in fact unchartered a few months. </Daniel>
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 16:40:27 UTC