- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:12:31 -0500
- To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 12/18/14 1:09 PM, Wayne Carr wrote: > Proposed > > [[ > 6.2.5 Working Group and Interest Group Charter Extension > > Charters may not be extended more than 6 months after the original > termination date. > ]] I can think of some scenarios where I would be OK with the staff extending a WG charter from 2.5 years to say 3.0 years without an AC review. (And, I also tend to prefer for ProcDoc not to be overly constraining and to assume the staff will DTRT.) That said, some specific data might convince me otherwise ;-). Would you please cite specific case(s) that were problematic? Also, if anyone has any data about the frequency of WG charter extensions beyond 2.5 years, please provide it. -Thanks, AB
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 13:13:00 UTC