- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:25:28 -0400
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- CC: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 5/23/13 11:04 AM, ext Karl Dubost wrote: > I was wondering what would be the best strategy for a new process document. Is it to "cut and distribute" in a way which makes the document still logical I think this would make sense for a "PD 2013" Edition. What is now the PD (possibly renamed to just "TR Process") is minimalistic and includes links to the information that was moved out of the old PD. As contributions address gaps like value proposition and others topics you suggested, they too can be referenced when it make sense. But basically, get agreement on what to remove and move, decide on where to "host" the material we want to move, assign volunteers to do the move and then just do it. (It's too bad we didn't do this before the AB elections started since it would have given all of the nominees an opportunity to "show their stuff".) -AB
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 15:26:02 UTC