- From: Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:15:06 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
That wouldn't be bad just for regular heartbeat drafts to have something change in the status section when a later draft was published -- like superseded by a later draft. >-----Original Message----- >From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] >Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 1:41 PM >To: public-w3process@w3.org >Subject: Re: End-of-lifing dead documents in /TR/ > >On 11/16/2011 01:37 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: >> >> Le 16 nov. 2011 à 15:33, fantasai a écrit : >>> I'd also say that relying on JavaScript for important information is >>> probably not the best idea ever. If it's important, it should be in >>> the document's content. >> >> Same issue if we were going to use CSS. > >Agreed. > >> I see only two accessible ways of doing it. >> >> 1. Changing the content of the document itself 2. Applying an HTTP >> redirection on a URI request to a specific page explaining the status >> for this URI (to avoid touching what is "printed" in TR/ space) > >If the Status of the document has changed, then the Status section should be >updated. Likewise the text at the top that says "Working Draft" >could be changed to "Abandoned/Unmaintained Draft". > >If this requires republishing, so be it. > >~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 22:15:36 UTC