- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:08:20 +1300
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
On Tuesday 2011-11-15 13:27 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:22:35 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > >On Nov 15, 2011, at 13:19 , Steve Faulkner wrote: > >>Case in point: I am a member of the protocols and formats > >>working group which works mainly in the member space. I think it > >>would benefit from people outside the W3C member space having > >>access technical discussion archives and meeting minutes. > > > >Aren't most groups chartered to be public these days? It certainly > >seems to me that PFWG would be a prime candidate for that. I'm > >guessing it's probably member-only because it's an old group. > > It was rechartered somewhat recently > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/charter201006 and was kept W3C Member-only > because of unspecified Members wanted it to be so, if memory serves > me. @mattur on twitter keeps track of those matters better than I > do. During the rechartering in June-August 2010, Mozilla did formally object to the PFWG operating in member space, but I think I failed to reply to followup emails quickly enough to keep the objection in play. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 20:09:18 UTC