- From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:05:12 +0000
- To: <dom@w3.org>, <public-w3process@w3.org>, <chaals@opera.com>
> From: ext Dominique Hazael-Massieux [dom@w3.org] > I think our first goal should be to refine what topics we want to work > on, what outcome we expect from the group; Yes, some initial work on the general problem statement makes sense. > I think it's fairly clear > that the Advisory Board would be the ultimate recipient of our input, > but whether that input is a list of issues, and/or a list of solutions > is not yet entirely clear to me (at least). This implementation detail seems secondary to me. > We should also try to identify which issues need fixing (because they > prevent groups to work adequately) vs would-be-nice-to-fix (to better > reflect how groups currently work); another axis of analysis should be > which can be fixed quickly (for some definition of quickly) and which > are longer-terms changes. Agree that enumerating the issues is the next step and then later do some prioritization. (Can you take the first step on this Dom e.g. create a wiki for the issues?) -AB
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 17:06:22 UTC