- From: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:27:58 +0000
- To: public-w3process@w3.org, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 16:28:40 UTC
On 15/11/2011 16:01, Robin Berjon wrote: > Additionally, I think that there are a few simple things that we > could do to improve how charters are handled in general (centralise > them under /charters/ in a way that's managed the way /TR/ is so that > people stop finding outdated ones, provide a decent template so that > people stop just copying off one another, include guidelines, stop > making finger-in-the-wind roadmaps that have not once matched > reality). Any good solution that doesn't turn looking for a charter into a wild cow chase has my vote. We might want to solve it out in two phases: Fix the worst issue now (even with a number of charters for all the current groups scattered here and there) and provide a good way to work in the future. Dom, does the groups db have a field for the (current) charter location? Cheers, -- Olivier
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 16:28:40 UTC