- From: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:52:11 +0000
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EC28AAB.8050102@bbc.co.uk>
On 15/11/2011 15:45, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to Kai for summarizing the session at TPAC on the blog: > http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/2011/11/15/results-from-tpac-2011-session-on-revisiting-how-w3c-creates-standards/ > > I think our first goal should be to refine what topics we want to work > on, what outcome we expect from the group; I think it's fairly clear > that the Advisory Board would be the ultimate recipient of our input, > but whether that input is a list of issues, and/or a list of solutions > is not yet entirely clear to me (at least). Thanks Dom (and thanks Steve for kicking the group alive!). One question I am wondering about is, if this (public) community group is likely to look at a number of issues surrounding the w3c process (small p), should we have a collective look at some of the unresolved issues around the Process Document? I know there is a list here: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Plan/process-issues but it is Member-only at the moment (and possibly outdated). For those in the group with access, it might be worth a look. Chime in if you find an issue there you would like to champion here? Cheers, Olivier
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 15:52:49 UTC