This is amazing. Thanks, Gerard!
Noreen
> On Mar 30, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Gerard CHOLLET <gerard.chollet@telecom-sudparis.eu> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We have been keeping track of publications in this domain. Please, find attached a list of links to references
> which could possibly be useful,...
>
> All the best, Gérard
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Gérard CHOLLET,PhD,DR,CNRS-SAMOVAR,gerard.chollet@TELECOM-SudParis.eu
> Institut Polytechnique de Paris, IMT-TSP, 9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011 Evry
> Tel: +33 1 75319628 , http://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/~chollet/
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
>
> De: "Noreen Whysel" <nwhysel@gmail.com>
> À: "Dirk Schnelle-Walka" <dirk@switch-consulting.de>
> Cc: "public-voiceinteraction" <public-voiceinteraction@w3.org>
> Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mars 2024 14:29:41
> Objet: Re: Improve support of LLMs?
>
> Perhaps a way to integrate knowledge graphs specific to a domain. Integration is key since each application would have its own knowledge graph
> and the standard can’t (and and shouldn’t have to) anticipate all concept models. I don’t personally know how to do that, but I’ve been reading
> a lot about how concept model integration is the next phase from Gen-AI to something that would actually be useful with a knowledge domain.
> And I do know some people who work in the knowledge graph space.
>
> Noreen
>
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 5:08 AM, Dirk Schnelle-Walka <dirk@switch-consulting.de> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have the impression that the currently followed architecture of is still too closely bound to traditional NLP based voice interaction concepts. While it aimed at including LLM with speech, LLM with multimodality, ... it is potentially not visible enough. We may want to also improve here.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Dirk
>
>
> <KGs and LLMs_v35.docx>