- From: Deborah Dahl <Dahl@conversational-Technologies.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 13:16:53 -0400
- To: <public-voiceinteraction@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2022/06/01-voiceinteraction-minutes.html and below as text. [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Voice Interaction Community Group 01 June 2022 [2]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/2022/06/01-voiceinteraction-irc Attendees Present bev, debbie, michael, noreen Regrets - Chair debbie Scribe ddahl Contents 1. [3]promotional work Meeting minutes promotional work debbie: jim put together a proposal for voice workshop at W3C . should try another way to promote that michael: jon was at the European Voice Lunch debbie: check to see if I sent bev the 100 word abstract debbie: can resend . if you can use it debbie: the second topic was reviewing the interfaces document . but let's skip that and talk about the MMI Architecture/Interfaces comparison debbie: reviews MMI architecture . sessionid and Context seem to be the same . requestid and RequestID are the same . MMI has a Data event vs. three fields for Interfaces document . Content/ContentURL isn't in the Interfaces document jim: we shouldn't tell the component what to do debbie: maybe we used to have a single system communicating vs now we have more collaborating systems jim: only one message type (Start) vs. collection of messages where the name implies the action jim: only one message type, with the first field the action that's being requested and the other fields are parameters for that action debbie: one messge e.g. "voiceInteractionMessage", with an action like start, stop, acknowledge debbie: fields could be contingent on actions jim: a specific message type has a fixed set of fields . could we define new messages? noreen: start is like a presence detection message in a chatbot debbie: we should think about presence detection jim: how do these instructions map to messages? debbie: how generic do we want the messages to be? jim: the messages should be pretty generic, like in MMI Architecture bev: messages should be kept at a high level . do we have a list of protocols? debbie: like HTTP or REST? . try to stay at top of protocol stack debbie: we should list messages jim: we should call these actions debbie: what about events? bev: thinks actions is good jim: could be messages, actions, or events
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2022 17:17:35 UTC