- From: Deborah Dahl <Dahl@conversational-Technologies.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 13:16:53 -0400
- To: <public-voiceinteraction@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2022/06/01-voiceinteraction-minutes.html
and below as text.
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Voice Interaction Community Group
01 June 2022
[2]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/2022/06/01-voiceinteraction-irc
Attendees
Present
bev, debbie, michael, noreen
Regrets
-
Chair
debbie
Scribe
ddahl
Contents
1. [3]promotional work
Meeting minutes
promotional work
debbie: jim put together a proposal for voice workshop at W3C
. should try another way to promote that
michael: jon was at the European Voice Lunch
debbie: check to see if I sent bev the 100 word abstract
debbie: can resend
. if you can use it
debbie: the second topic was reviewing the interfaces document
. but let's skip that and talk about the MMI
Architecture/Interfaces comparison
debbie: reviews MMI architecture
. sessionid and Context seem to be the same
. requestid and RequestID are the same
. MMI has a Data event vs. three fields for Interfaces document
. Content/ContentURL isn't in the Interfaces document
jim: we shouldn't tell the component what to do
debbie: maybe we used to have a single system communicating vs
now we have more collaborating systems
jim: only one message type (Start) vs. collection of messages
where the name implies the action
jim: only one message type, with the first field the action
that's being requested and the other fields are parameters for
that action
debbie: one messge e.g. "voiceInteractionMessage", with an
action like start, stop, acknowledge
debbie: fields could be contingent on actions
jim: a specific message type has a fixed set of fields
. could we define new messages?
noreen: start is like a presence detection message in a chatbot
debbie: we should think about presence detection
jim: how do these instructions map to messages?
debbie: how generic do we want the messages to be?
jim: the messages should be pretty generic, like in MMI
Architecture
bev: messages should be kept at a high level
. do we have a list of protocols?
debbie: like HTTP or REST?
. try to stay at top of protocol stack
debbie: we should list messages
jim: we should call these actions
debbie: what about events?
bev: thinks actions is good
jim: could be messages, actions, or events
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2022 17:17:35 UTC