- From: Deborah Dahl <Dahl@conversational-Technologies.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:37:30 -0500
- To: <public-voiceinteraction@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2022/01/12-voiceinteraction-minutes.html and below as text [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Voice Interaction 12 January 2022 [2]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/2022/01/12-voiceinteraction-irc Attendees Present bev, Debbie, dirk, Jim, jon Regrets - Chair Debbie Scribe ddahl Contents 1. [3]2022 plans 2. [4]architecture 3. [5]JSON semantic representation 4. [6]Summary of action items Meeting minutes 2022 plans debbie: let's talk about interfaces document debbie: just getting started debbie: talked about priorities for communication dirk: shows interfaces diagram debbie: client input and client response debbie: client input will mainly be speech + metadata dirk: would EMMA be suitable? . properties are in section 4.1 debbie: output will also be audio in general dirk: could also be text jim: do we need to list other kinds of multimodal data? . it seems kind of vague dirk: yes, didn't define this precisely jim: more types of metadata? debbie: let's not detail these at this point jim: what do you mean by multimodal input? dirk: pen, text, jim: should add some examples of multimodal inputs jim: are these categories or data items? jim: could distinguish categories from data items . metadata and multimodal are categories dirk: add another column for category <Bev> Hello debbie: do we agree that these are the priorities jim: yes debbie: the client response is primarily audio dirk: should we add a request id? debbie: yes jim: identifying major elements of client input and response . the other communication paths are ASR input and semantic input . these are the priorities . will build tables for these debbie: can build EMMA examples jim: should we build EMMA examples or finish building tables debbie: let's do both at the same time ACTION: dirk to fill in tables ACTION: debbie to build EMMA examples debbie: we should publish an update then architecture debbie: should we update the architecture? jim: we should do some publicity for architecture jon: has reached out to people in the voice world, for example Project Voice in Chattanooga debbie: could write about in standards dirk: will check about Conversational Interaction jim: is there a place in Europe? ACTION: jim to introduce Dirk to Marten jon: voice lunch is focused on conversational design jon: there are places to go to push this work into the public eye jim: what about a blog? jon: we can publish on LinkedIn, but the problem is getting people to read it . same thing about podcasts debbie: should we plan to update the architecture? dirk: probably not now JSON semantic representation debbie: is it still important to have a JSON version of EMMA? dirk: it would be beneficial, because JSON is preferred debbie: review JROSI jim: should that be a different community group? debbie: would there be some participation? jim: organize a community group about semantics debbie: people like to start something new jim: what about in the W3C? debbie: new W3C workshop jim: presentation at W3C plenary? Summary of action items 1. [7]dirk to fill in tables 2. [8]debbie to build EMMA examples 3. [9]jim to introduce Dirk to Marten
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2022 19:37:45 UTC