[voiceinteraction] minutes February 9, 2022

Thanks for joining today. The next call will be in two weeks, February 23, at the same time.

https://www.w3.org/2022/02/09-voiceinteraction-minutes.html
and below as text.

   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                             - DRAFT -
                   Voice Interaction Community Group

09 February 2022

   [2]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2022/02/09-voiceinteraction-irc

Attendees

   Present
          anastasios, debbie, dirk, jim, jon, ulrike, votis

   Regrets
          -

   Chair
          Debbie

   Scribe
          ddahl

Contents

    1. [3]changes to interface document

Meeting minutes

  changes to interface document

   [4]https://w3c.github.io/voiceinteraction/
   voice%20interaction%20drafts/paInterfaces/paInterfaces.htm

      [4] https://w3c.github.io/voiceinteraction/voice interaction drafts/paInterfaces/paInterfaces.htm

   dirk: changed diagram to focus on major interfaces

   jim: not sure what half circle notation means

   dirk: will add legend explaining notation
   . also added sequence diagram

   dirk: only shows calls to external processing

   jim: walks through sequence diagram

   dirk: will add "External processes" to "APIs/Data"
   . will add three labels to "APIs/Data"
   . will update both documents

   debbie: reviews overall work of group

   dirk: reviews architecture

   debbie: would be good to get comments on the public mailing
   list

   dirk: if there are questions we need to improve how we describe
   things

   public mailing list is public-voiceinteraction@w3.org

   jim: what if there is no IPA, what does it mean to send the
   interpretation back?

   dirk: sendInterpretation needs to be corrected

   jim: what is response to "callServices"?

   dirk: there should be a response, for example to indicate
   errors

   jim: every message should have a response

   ulrike: what is the small square?

   dirk: just shows that there is some activity going on there

   dirk: this is just one turn, there might be multiple turns

   jim: if neither IPA or service calls are present, what is the
   content of the response? must one of these be present?

   dirk: no

   debbie: the external services are not necessarily called

   dirk: should add a local call

   debbie: maybe add text that some client input can be completely
   handled on the local side

   jim: we need a box under the "opt service call" that there
   might be some dialog processing

   ulrike: can all three items occur?
   . external IPA, external service call, and local following one
   clientInput

   jim: squares are optional but they're independently optional

   dirk: optional things are independent of each other in the
   general case?
   . should we explain that?

   ulrike: I think it's clear

   dirk: added service call interface, semantic interface

   debbie: semantics should be aligned with JSON
   . should be able to add multi-intents and nbest intents
   . also nested entities

   jim: tables are more useful than text

Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2022 20:12:44 UTC