[voiceinteraction] minutes May 5, 2021

https://www.w3.org/2021/05/05-voiceinteraction-minutes.html
and below as text.
The next call will be May 19. At that call, we will decide whether to send
out a 48-hour Call for Consensus to publish the architecture draft. 

   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                             - DRAFT -
                   Voice Interaction Community Group

05 May 2021

   [2]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/05/05-voiceinteraction-irc

Attendees

   Present
          debbie, jim, jon

   Regrets
          bev

   Chair
          Debbie

   Scribe
          ddahl

Contents

    1. [3]Summary of action items

Meeting minutes

   looking at github issue #7

   assigned to Debbie

   looking at github issue 8 on dialog strategies

   jim: maybe we should call this "user-directed" meaning the user
   chooses the next step

   jon: scenario for dynamic situation?

   jim: user options depend on current context, if I wanted to fly
   to Europe there would be different airports than if I wanted to
   fly to Asia
   . or user just enters the airport name, whatever it is
   . user is not restricted
   . difference is whether the user selects the option or
   generates the option
   . just say "other" for now
   . will think about what this should be

   Action: debbie to assign Jim to this issue

   debbie: what about smart speaker interaction?

   jim: the 4th type is just open-ended
   . user input is unconstrained

   issue 10: [4]https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/10
   . we should accept this

      [4] https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/10

   A knowledge graph to reason -> add "is used"

   "the system uses a knowledge graph" avoids passive

   jim: do we have a publication deadline?

   jim: will adding a glossary slow us down too much?
   . it's more important to get this published

   debbie: I agree

   jon: terms have been defined within the text, maybe they could
   be cut and pasted into a glossary

   [5]https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/13

      [5] https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/13

   relationship to OVN Voice Registry

   jim: Dialog Strategy is different from VRS, should not
   reference VRS

   jon: let's wait until the VRS is more mature

   [6]https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/15

      [6] https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/15

   debbie: let's continue discussion with dirk

   jim: clarify in text?

   debbie: let's talk about [7]https://github.com/w3c/
   voiceinteraction/issues/17 next time

      [7] https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/17

   debbie: we can just publish
   . after a call for consensus

   jim: decide on publication next time

Summary of action items

    1. [8]debbie to assign Jim to this issue

Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2021 17:37:34 UTC