- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:42:02 -0400
- To: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 16:42:50 UTC
Hi Martin, Last time I heard, the W3C was revamping their validator to be based on the same engine as validator.nu, with some different rules, and they were recommending to use https://validator.w3.org/ instead of https://validator.nu/. So, if https://validator.w3.org/ is working and validating your markup (and I think is the recommended validator), then why bother with https://validator.nu/? Steph. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all: > > The popular HTML validator https://validator.nu/ seems to regard the > @content attribute as invalid for any other HTML element than meta. > > The W3C validator does not flag this as an error. > > Does anybody have a clue why https://validator.nu/ does not suport > HTML5+RDFa1.1? > > Martin > ----------------------------------- > martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de > mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp > > > > > > -- Steph.
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 16:42:50 UTC