On 03/26/2015 05:47 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: > Aaron: I think we are in agreement regarding the conclusion: Because MTEs are slippery ground, at least currently, we should keep Vehicle where it is now. > > I also agree that it would be very desirable if the sponsors of schema.org could properly support and document the use of MTEs. That is in the long run better than gradually moving more and more types beneath Product; and we also need MTEs for ProductModel cases anyway. Thank you Martin for creating this issue on Github and thank you Jarno and Aaron for your helpful feedback! https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/404
Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 12:35:11 UTC