Re: [schemaorg] MovieEvent type and properties for movie listings (#328) from Aaron Bradley on 2015-03-12 (public-vocabs@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:50:14 -0700
To: "schemaorg/schemaorg" <reply+000fc6027e7aeb89d76e1dea9744f8e05d1e54592694797492cf000000011119846792a16>
Cc: "schemaorg/schemaorg" <schemaorg@noreply.github.com>, Public Vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAMbipBsXg2MBoq0=0_k7_5nxiMh98vU=inMwoEqnLWEvir+qFw@mail.gmail.com>

Great points.  I'd add that in addition to ""presented in HD" or "presented
in IMAX" there's also "in 3D!"  This obviously transcends videoFrameSize
and videoQuality, so sort of makes the case for a separate videoFormat
property.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:44 AM, tmarshbing <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> @vholland <https://github.com/vholland>, videoFormat sounds good. How
> would you compare its use to videoFrameSize and videoQuality?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/328#issuecomment-78522446>.
>

Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 21:50:42 UTC