- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
- To: 'Alberto Nogales' <anogales81@gmail.com>, <public-vocabs@w3.org>, John Flynn <jflynn12@verizon.net>
- Cc: 'John Flynn' <jflynn12@verizon.net>
- Message-ID: <1131717268.4113970.1451514459295.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Thanks John, Along the same lines, I would suggest Strategy Markup Language (StratML ISO 17469-1). This schema is particularly for Strategic Plans. A refinement (Performance Plans and Reports) is in the ISO Process. There is a third part to StratML which includes Level and Scale Types including "PESTLE". As you can see from the attached spreadsheet, PESTLE and PMESII are two sides of the same coin with respect to element labeling (see PDF). Different, from the standpoint of the semantic web is that Strategic Planning and Performance Reporting collapse to zero sum games and obey Bell's Theorem at the boundaries (see picture attached, and Wikipedia Link). The "solution" to the Prisoner's Dilemma vis-a-vis the Minimax Theorem is that the game ends with or without a result - and a four year cycle ends after exactly 1461 day (lables) have past. I don't need a driverless car, Google. How about a hands-free snow shovel. --Gannon -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 12/28/15, John Flynn <jflynn12@verizon.net> wrote: Subject: RE: Vocabularies to classify terms To: "'Alberto Nogales'" <anogales81@gmail.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org Cc: "'John Flynn'" <jflynn12@verizon.net> Date: Monday, December 28, 2015, 9:27 PM There is a vocabulary that has been widely used by the US military called the Elements of National Power which is further described by PMESII (Political, Military, Economic, Social, Information Systems, and Infrastructure). The concept is that these six top-level categories are adequate to capture the key important factors of a country. I attached a VisioOWL graphic representation of the top elements. I also have the next level OWL breakout under each of the PMESII categories if you are interested. You can do a web search on Elements of National Power to find out more about this top-level vocabulary. John Flynnhttp://semanticsimulations.com From: Alberto Nogales [mailto:anogales81@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 7:36 PM To: public-vocabs@w3.org Subject: Vocabularies to classify terms Dear all, I am searching for vocabularies that let me classify terms, something similar to an upper ontology.I am explaining that with a term tree. Lets imagine that we have the first node that we will called "Categories". Then we will hace the main categories in the second level of the tree. And following we will have subcategories or terms. If a look for a term it will be classified by its main category. 1. Categories 1.1 Biology 1.1.1 Cell 1.1.2 Protein ... 1.1.N Mineral 1.2 Mathematics 1.2.1 Equation ... 1.2.N Geometry 1.2.N.1 Triangle .... 1.N Physics 1.N.1 Gravity So in this case if a want to classify the term gravity, the answer will be Physics. If I want to classify triangle, the answer will be Mathematics. Does anyone knows an ontology, taxonomy, etc similar to this. I need it to be expressed as rdf, owl or similar.Thanks.
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: Bell-Left.jpg
- application/pdf attachment: StrategicFactors.pdf
Received on Wednesday, 30 December 2015 22:28:10 UTC