W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2015

Re: relating IndividualProduct to Product

From: Jean delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:59:43 +0200
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "mfhepp@gmail.com" <mfhepp@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <C99B6E87-E601-4550-9932-68F411FD64A4@gmail.com>
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Hello
Would you consider Vehicle to be an individualProduct? If you describe a used car would you use individualProduct or Vehicle ?
Jean


Jean Delahousse

Independent Consultant
Semantic technologies, LinkedIn Open Data
delahousse.jean@gmail.com
mob +33 6 01 22 48 55
http://jean-delahousse.net 
skype jean.delahousse

> Le 10 avr. 2015 à 15:52, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> a écrit :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Looking at
> * http://schema.org/Product
>  "Any offered product or service. For example: a pair of shoes; a
> concert ticket; the rental of a car; a haircut; or an episode of a TV
> show streamed online."
> * http://schema.org/IndividualProduct
>  "A single, identifiable product instance (e.g. a laptop with a
> particular serial number)."
> 
> I struggle to understand how I can specify for IndividualProduct just
> URI of the relevant Product. For example
> 
> {
>  "@id": "https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone",
>  "@type": "Product",
>  "name": "The Fairphone"
> }
> 
> {
>  "@id": "https://graph.wwelves.org/704e3a57-c09e-4846-b27a-d31854096572"
>  "@type": "IndividualProduct",
>  "name": "A Fairphone currently used by elf Pavlik",
>  "serialNumber": "2092043924022"
> }
> 
> I understand that I could *duplicate* all the values of properties from
> * https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone
> on
> * https://graph.wwelves.org/704e3a57-c09e-4846-b27a-d31854096572
> But I would prefer to just reference it by URI and if needed embed
> information about Product resource in document describing
> IndividualProduct resource. And the generic data about Product would
> keep https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone as its subject.
> 
> Thank you for help with understanding how to do that, or pointing out
> flaws in my approach.
> 
> Cheers!
> 

Received on Sunday, 12 April 2015 13:00:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:40 UTC